Hi,

I myself have have not yet worked with TuneECU on a dynamometer, but in Germany, Austria, England and the U.S., there are professional tuners who work with TuneECU and it works just fine. It lasts a lot longer than with a "PCIII" but the results speak for themselves.

As a base, I would the "20551" or the "20546" use.

That the dealer wants only edit the F-tables, I can understand he wants to do anything wrong.
Of course, it can even more power over the I tables are fetched, but apparently the dealer has with the processing of I-tables no experience.

BR, Tom

Citazione Originariamente Scritto da HARRRRRRRRRR Visualizza Messaggio
Tom, I have another question for you!
I booked a dyno tuning but my dealer only does PCIII tuning. However he took a look at TuneEcu and he told me he wants to give it a try.
Have you got any experience of Dyno TuneEcu tuning?
My questions:

1) I have to choose a map to use as a starting point. My Tiger 1050 config is no cat, no sai, sc-project exhaust with "open-modded" dbkiller, k&n air filter, open airbox snorkel. I am currently running the 20543, which one do you suggest?
2) The dealer will temporarely fit the dyno lambda / o2 sensor just before the exhaust silencer (he already did the mod on the tube) and do the regulations in TuneEcu. He said he's only going to edit the F tables, is that correct or maybe your suggestion is to edit the other tables too? And how?
Thanks