quale fotocamera?

[Intrip]

almeno sulle fotocamere siamo d'accordo...

[ABCDEF]

appunto, cmq tra Canon e Panasonic



flag non so se approverà

se mi spieghi il motivo, non solo approvo, ma propugno e diffondo , se invece e' una affermazione circa la notorieta' o la simpatia della marca, sarebbe come dicessi che fra honda e triunz

ah, io sono canonista:reflex 40d e compatta G10.

[Intrip]

se mi spieghi il motivo, non solo approvo, ma propugno e diffondo , se invece e' una affermazione circa la notorieta' o la simpatia della marca, sarebbe come dicessi che fra honda e triunz

ah, io sono canonista:reflex 40d e compatta G10.

fatti una bella Panasonic x natale

[urasch]

canon

[Lo zar]

Entrambe ottime,ma dovessi scegliere andrei di Canon!

[ABCDEF]

DPREVIEW e' la piu' autorevole risorsa per la fotografia digitale sul web.

hanno recentemente fatto una comparativa di fotocamere bridge (ne mancano alcune, ma da una buona idea)

non c'e' la panasonic per la quale si era in dubbio, qui, ma il risultato e' comunque interessante (dovrei controllare le similitudini dei modelli testati con quello sul quale era richiesto un parere, a volte dal mercato usa a quello euro, le sigle cambiano.

copio di seguito la pagina di commento finale, nonche il link per vedersi il test completo.

buona lettura.

Conclusions

....... in terms of image quality the difference between the best and the worst in class is rather small. This means that other factors such as dimensions, features, usability or price, are likely to be playing an important role in you decision making process as well.

At both base ISO and higher sensitivities the image results from most cameras in this test would be almost indistinguishable on a 6x4 print. However, differences become more visible the more you magnify the image and at a 100 percent view the wheat is clearly being separated from the chaff. ...... The pictures from all the cameras in this test are certainly good enough for a normal album size print.

............. The inevitable consequence are very tightly pixel-packed sensors that are prone to noise-reduction smearing even at base ISO and perform poorly at high sensitivities. It's a relatively small price to pay though for the enormous flexibility in terms of mobility and zoom range offered by a compact superzoom camera.

Despite the gaps between rivaling models becoming smaller and smaller there are of course clear performance differences between the six contenders and we have described them in detail on the previous pages of this review. None of the models that we have tested are really bad cameras but some are simply better than others, and even those which are 'bottom of the class' in our ranking might still be suitable for your specific photographic requirements.

Image quality: outdoors / daylight

If you take the majority of your pictures outdoors in good light you won't be disappointed with any of the cameras in this test. There is very little difference between the output of the better cameras in this comparison. At normal viewing size the images are (apart from the slightly different renditions of color) virtually indistinguishable but at a larger magnification differences in the rendition of detail will become visible.

The Panasonics and the Sony produce consistently the most detail across the frame (The Sony's default sharpness is a little on the strong side though, you might want to dial it down). The Canon is almost on par with the leaders but loses a hint of detail towards the edges of the frame. The Samsung displays good sharpness across the frame but applies fairly strong noise reduction at base ISO, losing some low contrast detail. The Olympus lens produces visibly softer output than the rest of the pack and doesn't make things better by adding a good portion of noise reduction to the mix.

* Best of the bunch: Panasonic ZS1, Panasonic ZS3, Sony H20
* Middle of the road: Canon Powershot SX200 IS, Samsung HZ10W
* Bottom of the class: Olympus Stylus 9000

Image quality: Low light / High ISO

This is arguably the most difficult section to determine a ranking for. All six cameras in this test struggle to produce decent results at anything over ISO 400 thanks to their small sensors but while most of the results are equally 'bad' they have very different characteristics. At ISO 1600 all cameras show a lot of noise (both the luminance and chroma variant), noise reduction artifacts, color bleeding and detail smearing, but the 'mix' of these rather unpleasant image characteristics is a different one on each model making choosing a 'winner' a very difficult task.

The only camera that is, in terms of high ISO performance, noticeably worse than the competition, showing visibly more noise and detail smearing, is the Olympus Stylus 9000. Ranking the other cameras is almost entirely a matter of personal preference and it has to be stressed that when looking at the images at a typical 6x4 print size it is very hard to spot any differences. So when you look at our rankin below please bear in mind that the differences, at least between the best and middle ranked cameras, are fairly marginal.

* Best of the bunch: Panasonic ZS1, Panasonic ZS3, Sony H20
* Middle of the road: Canon SX200, Samsung HZ10W
* Bottom of the class: Olympus Stylus 9000

Image quality / performance: Flash

Most of the cameras produce perfectly good flash output and for the typical user there's little practical difference between them. The rankings below represent the sliver of difference between the best and worst based on flash exposure, flash reach, low light focus, recycle time and red eye removal.

* Best of the bunch: Sony H20, Samsung HZ10W
* Middle of the road: Panasonic ZS1, Panasonic ZS3
* Bottom of the class: Olympus Stylus 9000, Canon SX200

Ratings and recommendations

Looking at the rankings above the Panasonic twins ZS1 and ZS3 emerge as the obvious choice for general use, offering an extremely versatile 12x zoom range from proper wide-angle to 300mm equivalent and good all-around performance and image quality.

The Sony H20 is more or less on par from an image quality point of view but offers, due to its non-existent wide-angle lens, much less versatility than the other cameras in this test and its user-interface is really designed for point-and-shoot operation only. If you're mainly working at the long end of the lens and don't usually tend to set parameters manually it should be very high up on your short list though.

The Canon SX200 is no doubt a very decent camera but we simply can't see why you would choose it over a Panasonic ZS. It's image output is almost up there with the very best but it's a tad larger than its closest competitors and comes with a slightly annoying pop-up flash and a user interface that we found slightly more clunky than its predecessor.



So on, then, to the most important part of this review. And the winner is...
Joint winners: Panasonic ZS1 and ZS3

'Compact Super Zoom' Camera Group Test (Q2 2009) Review: 1. Introduction: Digital Photography Review

[speedtigre]

ragazzi....voglio un consiglio su questa tipologia di fotocamera,che abbia una buona ottica,un maxi zoom,con la modalita video in qualità HD,con la possibilità di utilizzare lo zoom durante i filmati.
non mi interessano le reflex,ma una fotocamare con queste caratteristiche.

ho già guardato con un amico fotografo,però volevo qualche parere in più

non ho trovato nikon di questo genere,ho scartato le sony sono troppo costose.
la fuji finepix s2000hd viene 200 euro ma è troppo scarsa.

ps. sono troppo esigente

[edotto]

ho preso la canon da dieci giorni.

stupenda.

quoto.

[davebike]

Ale io ho la FZ8 della panasonic ed è 1 figata!!! Monta ottiche Leica!!!

Pienamente soddisfatto!!!

[speedtigre]

ho preso la canon da dieci giorni.

stupenda.

ho letto che non c'è il manuale d'uso,è vero?

Ale io ho la FZ8 della panasonic ed è 1 figata!!! Monta ottiche Leica!!!

Pienamente soddisfatto!!!

è per quello che sono indeciso